With NERDS hitting 7 years old and growing over 30 people, it has been long overdue to hold our first retreat. We did so last week at the AI Pioneer Center, in the old astronomic observatory inside Copenhagen’s beautiful botanic garden (plus awesome dinner at Food Club Nørrebro), organized by Jonas, Jan, and Toine.
The retreat was a wonderful event that deepened our social ties, where we learned much more about each other, and discussed what works well or what does not work so well at NERDS.
On all levels, from fac
ulties to long-term NERDS and visitors, we identified issues we want to improve, including diversity and hiring, more internal exchange, website updates, or more formalized tasks with ownership (and PhD duty credits). It was great to see though that we do not have any serious social issues – to the contrary, the retreat was a confirmation of how well we all get along, and how nice a research group can be. ❤️
In the coming weeks we are going to get to work to implement the short-term-implementable issues, keep pushing for improving our long-term issues to make NERDS an even better place, and definitely aim to make the NERDS retreat a recurring experience!












Users often turn to online forums when searching for known books, movies, or games that they cannot identify through conventional search engines. These “tip-of-the tongue” requests present a unique challenge, appearing highly variable in formulation, context, and specificity. So far, these could mostly only be solved by other humans answering in forums. Generative AI is believed to help solve these specific questions. In this work, we manually annotated 150 requests each for books, games, and movies in the casual leisure domain to study the differences between solved and unsolved requests and identify factors that influence their difficulty. We compare human responses in forum threads with the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) under similar conditions. Specifically, we investigate how the formulation of requests affects human and LLM success; how item properties impact LLM retrieval; how interaction and feedback within a thread shape human and LLM performance; and whether increasing the information provided to an LLM improves its chances of solving the request. Our findings offer new insights into what makes these known-item search problems easier or harder to solve. This study contributes to a better understanding of complex search behavior and the role of LLMs in helping with difficult casual-leisure information needs.

